ArticleScientific reports2024
The impact of emotional valence on the spatial scope of visual selective attention.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Interference control of emotional information: effect of relevance and valence.Psychological research · 2026Article
- Effects of Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation to the Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex on Attention to Emotional Stimuli: A Randomized Controlled Trial.Brain sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The brain's ability to prioritize behaviorally relevant sensory inputs (i.e., targets) while ignoring irrelevant distractors is crucial for efficient information processing. However, the role of emotional valence in modulating selective attention remains underexplored. This study examined how positive and negative emotions alter the spatial scope of visual selective attention using a modified Eriksen Flanker task. Participants viewed an emotional face cue (happy, angry, or neutral) randomly positioned on the screen and then identified the shape of a subsequent neutral target (bowtie or diamond) at the cued location. Adjacent stimuli either matched the target shape (congruent) or differed (incongruent). Results showed that happy faces increased susceptibility to distractors (i.e., a larger incongruency effect), suggesting a broadening of attentional scope, while angry faces reduced susceptibility (i.e., a smaller incongruency effect), indicating a narrowing of focus. Importantly, the magnitude of this emotion-driven attention modulation was negatively correlated with participants' self-reported levels of psychological distress. Participants with higher stress and depression exhibited weaker attention broadening in response to positive cues. Together, the findings provide behavioral evidence of how emotional valence influences attention scope, offering potential insights into the dynamic interplay between psychological distress, emotional processing, and attention modulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.