ArticleScientific reports2024
Machine learning evaluation of a hypertension screening program in a university workforce over five years.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global prevalence of hypertension continues excessively elevated, especially among low- and middle-income nations. Workplaces provide tremendous opportunities as a unique, easily accessible and practical avenue for early diagnosis and treatment of hypertension among the workforce class. The evaluation of such a Workplace Screening Strategy can give insight into its possible effects. Innovative machine learning approaches like k-means clustering are underutilized for such assessments. We set out to use this technology to analyze the results of our university's yearly health checkup of the employees for hypertension. An anonymized dataset including the demographics and blood pressure monitoring information gathered from workers in various departments/units of a learning organization. The overall amount of samples or data values is 1, 723, and the supplied dataset includes six attributes, such as year group (2018, 2019, 2021, 2022), Department/Unit (academic and non-academic), and gender (male and female), with the intended output being the blood pressure status (low, normal, and high). The dataset was analyzed using machine learning approaches. In this longitudinal study, it was discovered that the average age for the workforce is 42. Similarly, it was revealed that hypertension was common among employees over the age of 40, regardless of gender or occupational type (academic or nonacademic). The data also found that there was a consistent drop in the prevalence of hypertension from 2018 to 2022. According to the study findings, the use of machine learning algorithms for periodic evaluations of workplace health status monitoring initiatives (particularly for hypertension) is feasible, realistic, and sustainable in diagnosing and controlling hypertension among those in the workforce.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.