ArticleNature communications2024
A landscape of X-inactivation during human T cell development.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A pan-cancer single-cell atlas uncovers the role of sex hormones and chromosomes in sex-divergent reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Opportunities for RNA sequencing in physiology: from big data to understanding homeostasis and heterogeneity.Function (Oxford, England) · 2026Review
- Genomic Instability and Clonal Hematopoiesis in the Deep-Space Environment: The Role of Sex-Chromosome Asymmetry and High-LET Radiation.Current stem cell reports · 2026Article
- Clinical description, genetic analysis and characterization of two NLRP12 heterozygous VUS variants.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Immunopathogenesis and Therapeutics of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: an Integrative Review.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Decoding sex differences in human immunity through systems immunology.Oxford open immunology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Females exhibit a more robust immune response to both self-antigens and non-self-antigens than males, resulting in a higher prevalence of autoimmune diseases but more effective responses against infection. Increased expression of X-linked immune genes in female T cells is thought to underlie this enhanced response. Here we isolate thymocytes from pediatric thymi of healthy males (46, XY), females (46, XX), a female with completely skewed X-chromosome inactivation (46, XX, cXCI) and a female with Turner syndrome (45, X0). Using whole exome sequencing, RNA sequencing and DNA methylation data, we present a sex-aware expression profile of T cell development and generate a high-resolution map of escape from X-chromosome inactivation (XCI). Unexpectedly, XCI is transcriptionally and epigenetically stable throughout T cell development, and is independent of expression of XIST, the lncRNA responsible for XCI initiation during early embryonic development. In thymocytes, several genes known to escape XCI are expressed from only one X-chromosome. Additionally, we further reveal that a second X-chromosome is dispensable for T cell development. Our study thus provides a high-resolution map of XCI during human development and suggests a re-evaluation of XCI in sex differences in T cell function.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.