ArticleThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2024
Sessile Serrated Lesions: Searching for the True Prevalence and Risk Factors in China.
Article in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Distinguishing colorectal sessile serrated lesions from hyperplastic polyps: development of a prediction model based on logistic regression.BMC gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Comment on Machine Learning-Based Prediction of Histopathological Classification in Colorectal Polyps.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026Article
- Endoscopic management of a sessile serrated lesion at the appendiceal orifice.Endoscopy international open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issuedErratum.2025
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Growing recognition identifies sessile serrated lesions (SSL) as colorectal cancer (CRC) precursors. However, the SSL detection rate remains debatable and lacks a definitive consensus. Additionally, understanding the influencing factors in SSL development is limited. We aim to retrospectively analyze the true prevalence and risk factors of SSL in China. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study collected medical data from patients who underwent colonoscopy at the Endoscopy Center of Shanghai East Hospital affiliated with Tongji University between March 1, 2019 and February 28, 2022. Data were sourced through the electronic medical record system and included information such as age, sex, lesion location, number, and pathology. This study predominantly focused on the detection rate and the clinical and endoscopic features of SSL. Results: Of 72 287 colonoscopies in 3 years, 3905 cases were histologically confirmed as SSL. Among them, 2290 (58.6%) were male, and 1615 (41.4%) were female. The overall SSL detection rate was 5.40%, slightly surpassing Asian/Chinese averages but lower than Western rates. Males had a higher SSL detection rate (6.1%) than females (4.6%). Univariate analysis revealed a significant association between SSL with dysplasia/adenocarcinoma (SSL-D/AD) and obesity (Body Mass Index, BMI ≥ 24), CRC family history, and hypertension. After multivariable logistic regression, only obesity (BMI ≥ 24) remained a statistically significant independent risk factor for SSL-D/AD. Conclusions: The SSL detection rate at our center is 5.4% and increases with age. Males have a significantly higher detection rate than females. Our findings suggest that endoscopists should consider risk factors for SSL-D/AD, such as obesity, CRC family history, and hypertension.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.