Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632731›Full record

ArticleThe Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology2024

Multidisciplinary Approach to Perihilar and Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Single-Center Experience.

Adnan Gundogdu, Taha Anil Kodalak, Hakan Kucukaslan, Serdar Topaloglu, Ummuhan Turali, Sukru Oguz, Davut Dohman, Hasan Dinc, Feyyaz Ozdemir, Mehmet Arslan and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Ametabolic FDG-PET in Splenic Angiosarcoma: A Diagnostic Challenge.The Turkish journal of gastroenterology : the official journal of Turkish Society of Gastroenterology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Adnan GundogduDepartment of Surgery, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Taha Anil KodalakDepartment of Surgery, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Hakan KucukaslanDepartment of Surgery, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Serdar TopalogluDepartment of Surgery, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Ummuhan TuraliDepartment of Pathology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Sukru OguzDepartment of Radiology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Davut DohmanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Hasan DincDepartment of Radiology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Feyyaz OzdemirDepartment of Medical Oncology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Mehmet ArslanDepartment of Gastroenterology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Umit CobanogluDepartment of Pathology, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Erdem KarabulutDepartment of Biostatistics, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Türkiye.
Adnan CalikDepartment of Surgery, Karadeniz Technical University School of Medicine, Trabzon, Türkiye.
Mehmet Halil OzturkDepartment of Radiology, Sakarya University Faculty of Medicine, Sakarya, Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background/Aims: Treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC) is a challenging issue. We aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics of both tumors and the outcome of our treatment policy. Material and Methods: We retrospectively analyzed data of 117 patients who were diagnosed with PHCC or IHCC between January 2007 and September 2023. Postoperative outcomes and the effects of prognostic factors on overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results: Surgical resection was performed on 47 patients (PHCC, n = 33 and IHCC, n = 14). Preoperative biliary drainage was applied in 32 of 33 cases with PHCC and 2 of 14 cases with IHCC. The mortality rate was 8.5% (n = 4). The complication rate was 68.1%. The R0 resection rate was 73% in PHCC. The mean OS time of PHCC cases that underwent R0 resection was 26.5 ± 24.8 months. The mean OS time of patients who underwent resection for IHCC was 28.7 ± 35.5 months. The OS was poorly affected by high CA19-9 levels (≥37 U/mL) (P = .005), the presence of lymphovascular invasion (P = .049), positive surgical margins after resection (P < .001), and the development of postoperative acute renal failure (P = .078). The OS of patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly longer (P = .071). CA19-9 levels of more than 37 U/mL (P = .027) and positive surgical margin (P < .001) were independent factors for poor OS. Conclusion: Surgical resection is the mainstay of multidisciplinary treatment for PHCC and IHCC. In advanced stages of IHCC, the combination of loco-regional therapies and repeat surgery, along with the enhanced efficacy of systemic chemotherapy, plays a significant role in a patient's survival.

Indexed as

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaperihilar cholangiocarcinomapostoperative outcomeprognostic factorssurgical treatment

Identifiers

PMID39632731
PMCPMC11736857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.