Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632499›Full record

ArticleCancer medicine2024

Meeting Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines and Associations With Physical Fitness in Men With Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Baseline Results of the Multicentre INTERVAL-GAP4 Trial.

Lisa Umlauff, Stacey A Kenfield, Robert U Newton, Nicolas H Hart, Fred Saad, Kerry S Courneya, Rosemary Greenwood, Wilhelm Bloch, INTERVAL‐GAP4 Steering Committee/Coordinating Centres Members/Protocol Development Working Group Members, Moritz Schumann

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02730338 (INTense ExeRcise for SurviVAL Among Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02730338 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

INTense ExeRcise for SurviVAL Among Men with Metastatic Prostate Cancer (INTERVAL - GAP4): a Multicentre, Randomised, Controlled, Phase III Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorMovember FoundationRan2016 to 2026Enrolled866ConditionsMetastatic Prostate CancerArmsHigh intensity aerobic and resistance training, Psychosocial support
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lisa UmlauffDepartment for Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3590-7238
Stacey A KenfieldDepartment of Urology and Epidemiology & Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1585-7352
Robert U NewtonExercise Medicine Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0302-6129
Nicolas H HartExercise Medicine Research Institute, School of Medical and Health Sciences, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, Western Australia, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2794-0193
Fred SaadCancers Génito-Urinaires, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2986-5617
Kerry S CourneyaFaculty of Kinesiology, Sport, and Recreation, College of Health Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9677-3918
Rosemary GreenwoodYork Trials Unit, Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK.
Wilhelm BlochDepartment for Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
INTERVAL‐GAP4 Steering Committee/Coordinating Centres Members/Protocol Development Working Group Members
Moritz SchumannDepartment for Molecular and Cellular Sports Medicine, Institute of Cardiovascular Research and Sports Medicine, German Sport University Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Funding

Movember Foundation: Global Action Plan-4
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study compared the physical activity level of men with metastatic prostate cancer at baseline of the multicentre INTERVAL-GAP4 trial to the American Cancer Society guidelines and examined associations with physical fitness.

methodsA total of 140 men on androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) were included in this cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from the INTERVAL-GAP4 trial. Exclusion criteria included a maximum of 1 h of vigorous aerobic exercise or one structured resistance exercise session per week but no restrictions on habitual physical activity. Moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) was assessed using a modified Godin-Shephard Leisure-Time Physical Activity Questionnaire. Physical fitness measurements included peak oxygen consumption (VO

resultsTotal self-reported MVPA was 60 (IQR: 0, 180) min per week, with 29% meeting the aerobic physical activity guidelines. There was a statistically significant association of higher MVPA with higher relative VO

conclusionFew men recruited to the INTERVAL-GAP4 trial were meeting aerobic physical activity guidelines at baseline. Higher MVPA was associated with better aerobic capacity and walking performance but not maximal strength in men with metastatic prostate cancer on ADT.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02730338; German Clinical Trials Register: DRKS00010310.

Indexed as

ExercisePhysical FitnessProstatic NeoplasmsAgedAndrogen AntagonistsCross-Sectional StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisOxygen ConsumptionAndrogen Antagonistsandrogen deprivation therapyandrogen receptor inhibitorendurance performancemaximal strength

Identifiers

PMID39632499
PMCPMC11617593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.