ArticleMedical science monitor basic research2024
Adult Intussusception in Jordan: Demographics, Clinical Features, and Outcomes from a Tertiary Hospital.
Article in Medical science monitor basic research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adult transverse colon intussusception: A case report and literature review.Radiology case reports · 2026Article
- Adult intussusception in a tropical setting: real-world surgical diagnosis in low-resource settings.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adult intussusception (AI) is a rare condition with diverse clinical presentations and management challenges. Despite its rarity, understanding its epidemiology, clinical features, and predictive factors distinguishing benign and malignant lead points is crucial for effective management. This study aimed to assess the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with pathological AI and examine factors associated with malignant lead points. MATERIAL AND METHODS Medical records of patients aged >18 years with diagnosis of AI between January 1, 2014, and January 1, 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were classified based on location and etiology of intussusception. Predictive factors for malignant lead points were assessed, including age, sex, presenting symptoms, location, and size of intussusception. Computed tomography (CT) scan images were reviewed for diagnosis confirmation. Transient small bowel intussusceptions and intussusceptions related to feeding tubes were excluded. RESULTS Twenty-six cases of pathological AI were identified over 10 years, with a male predominance (69.2%) and a mean age of 53.3 years. Abdominal pain was the most common presenting symptom (65.4%), with bowel obstruction diagnosed in 23.1% of cases. CT scans were the primary diagnostic modality (92.3%). Colocolic intussusceptions were most prevalent (53.8%), and surgical management was common (69.2%). Histopathological examination revealed benign lead points in the majority (57.7%) of cases, with lipomas and polyps being the most common. Bleeding per rectum was significantly associated with malignant lead points (P=0.011). CONCLUSIONS AI presents with diverse clinical features. It predominantly affects the colon. Bleeding per rectum indicates a higher likelihood of malignant lead points. A multidisciplinary approach is essential for optimal case-based management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.