Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632263›Full record

ReviewThe New phytologist2025

The promising role of proteomes and metabolomes in defining the single-cell landscapes of plants.

Christopher R Anderton, R Glen Uhrig

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The New phytologist, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Christopher R Anderton *Environmental Molecular Sciences Laboratory, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6170-1033
R Glen Uhrig *Department of Biological Sciences, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2E9, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-2773-4381

Funding

Biological and Environmental Research DE-AC36-08GO28308Division of Molecular and Cellular Biosciences 2052590Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada ALLRP 587089-23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The plant community has a strong track record of RNA sequencing technology deployment, which combined with the recent advent of spatial platforms (e.g. 10× genomics) has resulted in an explosion of single-cell and nuclei datasets that can be positioned in an in situ context within tissues (e.g. a cell atlas). In the genomics era, application of proteomics technologies in the plant sciences has always trailed behind that of RNA sequencing technologies, largely due in part to upfront cost, ease-of-use, and access to expertise. Conversely, the use of early analytical tools for characterizing small molecules (metabolites) from plant systems predates nucleic acid sequencing and proteomics analysis, as the search for plant-based natural products has played a significant role in improving human health throughout history. As the plant sciences field now aims to fully define cell states, cell-specific regulatory networks, metabolic asymmetry and phenotypes, the measurement of proteins and metabolites at the single-cell level will be paramount. As a result of these efforts, the plant community will unlock exciting opportunities to accelerate discovery and drive toward meaningful translational outcomes.

Indexed as

MetabolomePlantsProteomeSingle-Cell AnalysisPlant CellsProteomicsProteomemass spectrometrymetabolomicsmulti‐omicsproteomicssingle cell

Identifiers

PMID39632263
PMCPMC11711919

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.