ReviewNursing & health sciences2024
Clinical Research Practitioner: Transformation to a Competent Professional Through Reflective Practice.
Review in Nursing & health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) has significantly contributed to the growth of clinical research activities in the United Kingdom. Central to this expansion is the pivotal role of Clinical Research Practitioners (CRPs) within the healthcare organization. This narrative explores reflective practice as a dynamic tool and essential requirements for their transformation and development into competent CRPs. Additionally, this article adds to the growing literature to highlight the benefits of having a professionally registered CRP for NHS organizations. By weaving together personal insights, professional development, and the integration of acquired knowledge, the narrative illuminates the profound impact of reflective practice on the evolution of a skilled and adept CRP. This review adds to the current literature on the importance of reflective practice in improving professionalism and competency for registered CRPs. The narrative emphasizes lifelong learning and reflective practice integration in clinical research training programs. It suggests further research on workplace reflection for knowledge integration. This resource is valuable for CRPs, organizations, and policymakers, emphasizing professionalism, competency development, and reflective practice in clinical research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.