ArticleBMJ open2024
Flooding and health in Australia: a scoping review and coauthorship analysis of published research.
Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longer-term impacts of flooding on Australian health systems: insights from medical students on rural clinical placement.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAustralia is frequently affected by floods, and their severity and frequency are predicted to increase due to the effects of climate change. Over the past decade, there has been an increase in the number of publications reporting on the health impacts of flooding in Australia, but no synthesis of this research evidence has previously been published. The aim of this scoping review is to identify and map publications on the health impacts of flooding in Australia and to describe the networks of researchers contributing to this research.
methodsIn the study, we applied the scoping review methodology guided by Johanna Briggs Institute and coauthorship network analysis. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINHAL, Scopus and Web of Science for all publications up to 31 December 2023. Screening, full-text review and data extraction were completed by two independent reviewers. Coauthor networks were constructed using social network analysis methods.
results69 publications were included, spanning a 70-year period from 1951 to 2023. The top three health impacts studied were post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), distress and child developmental outcomes, with the predominant focus in the past 10 years of recent publications on prenatal maternal stress, child outcomes and mental health impacts. There was minimal focus on socially vulnerable groups and long-term health impacts and few qualitative research studies were reported. Coauthorship analysis showed the primarily disease-specific nature of flood-related research.
conclusionOur review enhances understanding of the research on the physical and mental health impacts of flooding in Australia by identifying the areas of relatively greater research activity, existing research gaps and potential future research priorities. Given the context-dependent nature of flood and other climate-related health impacts, and of mitigation and adaptation responses, we anticipate that our review findings will enhance the understanding of this topic for Australia and other higher-income countries, identifying areas of focus and current research gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.