Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632110›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Effectiveness of advance care planning programmes in improving end-of-life outcomes for individuals with dementia and their caregivers in nursing homes: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yu-Tai Lo, Yi-Jhen Chen, Jheng-Yan Wu, Chih-Cheng Lai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yu-Tai Lo *Department of Geriatrics and Gerontology, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Yi-Jhen Chen *Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan.
Jheng-Yan Wu *Department of Public Health, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan dtmed141@gmail.com andy10271@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3290-1909
Chih-Cheng Lai *Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan dtmed141@gmail.com andy10271@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6334-2388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionWith advances in medicine and the resultant increased ageing population, dementia, including Alzheimer's disease, has become a leading cause of death in individuals aged over 65 years in nursing homes. The unpredictable trajectory of the disease, marked by cognitive and functional decline, necessitates intensive healthcare and poses challenges to end-of-life (EoL) care decisions, particularly because majority of the affected individuals become unable to make their own decisions. This highlights the importance of advance care planning (ACP) programmes that enable individuals with dementia to define and communicate their EoL care decisions in advance. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the effectiveness of ACP in nursing homes for patients with dementia and their caregivers. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This systematic review and meta-analysis will include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that evaluate the effectiveness of ACP programmes in improving EoL outcomes in individuals with dementia and their caregivers in nursing homes. EoL outcomes include (1) quality of life; (2) caregiver satisfaction; (3) advance directives completion rate, which refers to the proportion of individuals with completed, documented EoL care preferences; (4) uptake of ACP discussion indicating the frequency or occurrence of these discussions between healthcare providers, patients and/or family members; and (5) comfort in the last week of life. Studies will be retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and ClinicalTrials.gov between their inception and 31 January 2024. Eligible articles will be selected according to prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality of the included articles will be assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool 2.0 for RCTs and risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions for observational studies. The certainty of evidence will be evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework. Publication bias will be assessed using a funnel plot and Egger's test to detect any asymmetry in the distribution of effect sizes across studies. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses will be conducted to address heterogeneity. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required for this systematic review and meta-analysis, as it involves the synthesis of existing literature without direct data collection or patient participation. The results of this study will be compiled into a detailed report, which will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. Additionally, the findings will be shared with academic partners, healthcare professionals and organisations involved in dementia care, as well as policymakers and stakeholders in the field of long-term care for individuals with dementia. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023489126.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningCaregiversDementiaNursing HomesQuality of LifeTerminal CareAgedHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicResearch DesignSystematic Reviews as TopicDementiaMeta-AnalysisNursing Homes

Identifiers

PMID39632110
PMCPMC11624717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.