Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39632087›Full record

ArticleGenome research2024

Characterization of DNA methylation reader proteins in

Jonathan Cahn, James P B Lloyd, Ino D Karemaker, Pascal W T C Jansen, Jahnvi Pflueger, Owen Duncan, Jakob Petereit, Ozren Bogdanovic, A Harvey Millar, Michiel Vermeulen and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Jonathan Cahn *ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5006-741X
James P B Lloyd *ARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4492-1368
Ino D KaremakerRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Pascal W T C JansenRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Jahnvi PfluegerARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Owen DuncanARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Jakob PetereitARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Ozren BogdanovicARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
A Harvey MillarARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia.
Michiel VermeulenRadboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen, Nijmegen 6525 GA, The Netherlands.
Ryan ListerARC Centre of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, School of Molecular Sciences, The University of Western Australia, Crawley, Western Australia 6009, Australia; ryan.lister@uwa.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0001-6637-7239

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In plants, cytosine DNA methylation (mC) is largely associated with transcriptional repression of transposable elements, but it can also be found in the body of expressed genes, referred to as gene body methylation (gbM). gbM is correlated with ubiquitously expressed genes; however, its function, or absence thereof, is highly debated. The different outputs that mC can have raise questions as to how it is interpreted-or read-differently in these sequence and genomic contexts. To screen for potential mC-binding proteins, we performed an unbiased DNA affinity pull-down assay combined with quantitative mass spectrometry using methylated DNA probes for each DNA sequence context. All mC readers known to date preferentially bind to the methylated probes, along with a range of new mC-binding protein candidates. Functional characterization of these mC readers, focused on the MBD and SUVH families, was undertaken by ChIP-seq mapping of genome-wide binding sites, their protein interactors, and the impact of high-order mutations on transcriptomic and epigenomic profiles. Together, these results highlight specific context preferences for these proteins, and in particular the ability of MBD2 to bind predominantly to gbM. This comprehensive analysis of

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA MethylationBinding SitesCytosineDNA, PlantGene Expression Regulation, PlantProtein BindingArabidopsis ProteinsCytosineDNA-Binding ProteinsDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID39632087
PMCPMC11694752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.