Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39631836›Full record

ReviewZhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer2024

[Application of Patient-reported Outcomes and Shared Decision-making 
in Thoracic Surgery].

Weihao Chen, Mengni Zhang, Cheng Shen

Abstract readReviewEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Review in Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weihao ChenWest China School of Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan 
University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Mengni ZhangDepartment of Pathology, West China Hospital, Sichuan 
University, Chengdu 610041, China.
Cheng ShenDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan 
University, Chengdu 610041, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Thoracic surgery encompasses the diagnosis and treatment of various chest diseases such as lung cancer, esophageal cancer, and mediastinal tumors. The treatment plans for these diseases are complex and often involve a combination of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy, each with different impacts on the patient's quality of life. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) and shared decision-making (SDM) are becoming increasingly important in this field. PRO allows patients to directly report their health status and the effects of treatment, aiding doctors in adjusting treatment plans. SDM ensures that treatment plans align with the patient's personal values and preferences through information sharing and joint decision-making. The comprehensive application of PRO and SDM can enhance patient satisfaction and treatment outcomes, though it also faces challenges such as data collection and time management. Future research should focus on developing more efficient PRO tools and SDM processes to improve patient-centered healthcare quality.
.

Indexed as

Decision Making, SharedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresDecision MakingHumansThoracic SurgeryThoracic Surgical ProceduresDoctor-patient relationshipPatient-reported outcomesShared decision-makingThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID39631836
PMCPMC11629092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.