Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39631828›Full record

ArticleBMJ mental health2024

Potential research priorities for understanding and treating severe paranoia (persecutory delusions): a priority-setting partnership between patients, carers, mental health staff, and researchers.

David Ariel Sher, Thomas Kabir, Maurice Arbuthnott, Suzie Nettleton, Pauline Dixon, Joanna May, Alvaro Barrera, Poppy Brown, Sarah Reeve, Louise Isham and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

David Ariel SherDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK david.sher@psy.ox.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0528-7904
Thomas KabirDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Maurice ArbuthnottAdvisory Group, Oxford, UK.
Suzie NettletonAdvisory Group, Oxford, UK.
Pauline DixonAdvisory Group, Oxford, UK.
Joanna MayBerkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, Bracknell, Bracknell Forest, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0785-9283
Alvaro BarreraDepartment of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4716-8487
Poppy BrownOxford Institute of Clinical Psychology Training and Research, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Sarah ReeveNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9374-0950
Louise IshamDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Felicity WaiteDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Daniel FreemanDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA persecutory delusion (severe paranoia) occurs when a person believes that others are trying to harm them when they are not. It is often a central difficulty for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia.

objectiveThe objective is to identify potentially important research questions about severe paranoia.

methodsA priority-setting partnership exercise was conducted involving people with lived experience, carers, mental health staff, and researchers. An initial survey identified research questions, and a second survey prioritised a refined list of questions. There was a project steering group.

findings1480 responses were gathered from 146 people (56 people with lived experience, 23 family members, 78 mental health staff, and 21 researchers). Following refinement, 201 questions were rated by the steering group for priority to enter the second survey. 38 questions were rated in the second survey by 157 people (69 people with lived experience, 33 family members, 59 mental health staff, and 27 researchers). 15 questions were identified as research priorities, each endorsed to a largely similar extent across stakeholder groups. These covered a wide range of topics, including how to support family and carers, understanding the causes of paranoia, managing paranoid thoughts day-to-day, improving access to services, and developing psychological and pharmacological approaches.

conclusionsThere was a good deal of consensus in key questions-covering many aspects of understanding, treatment, and support-to be answered about severe paranoia. Most questions were considered largely equally important. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Numerous questions were identified that, if addressed, might improve clinical provision for persecutory delusions.

Indexed as

CaregiversParanoid DisordersAdultDelusionsFemaleHumansMaleMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedResearchResearch PersonnelSurveys and QuestionnairesPSYCHIATRYSchizophrenia & psychotic disorders

Identifiers

PMID39631828
PMCPMC11624696

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.