ArticleBMJ mental health2024
Potential research priorities for understanding and treating severe paranoia (persecutory delusions): a priority-setting partnership between patients, carers, mental health staff, and researchers.
Article in BMJ mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Identifying Research Priorities in Early Psychosis: A Collaborative Approach to Shaping the Future of Early Psychosis Clinical Trials in Australia.Early intervention in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Transdiagnostic App-Based Cognitive Bias Modification Intervention for Paranoia (Successful Treatment of Paranoia; STOP): Protocol for a Mixed Methods Process Evaluation Embedded in a Randomized Controlled Trial.JMIR research protocols · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA persecutory delusion (severe paranoia) occurs when a person believes that others are trying to harm them when they are not. It is often a central difficulty for patients diagnosed with schizophrenia.
objectiveThe objective is to identify potentially important research questions about severe paranoia.
methodsA priority-setting partnership exercise was conducted involving people with lived experience, carers, mental health staff, and researchers. An initial survey identified research questions, and a second survey prioritised a refined list of questions. There was a project steering group.
findings1480 responses were gathered from 146 people (56 people with lived experience, 23 family members, 78 mental health staff, and 21 researchers). Following refinement, 201 questions were rated by the steering group for priority to enter the second survey. 38 questions were rated in the second survey by 157 people (69 people with lived experience, 33 family members, 59 mental health staff, and 27 researchers). 15 questions were identified as research priorities, each endorsed to a largely similar extent across stakeholder groups. These covered a wide range of topics, including how to support family and carers, understanding the causes of paranoia, managing paranoid thoughts day-to-day, improving access to services, and developing psychological and pharmacological approaches.
conclusionsThere was a good deal of consensus in key questions-covering many aspects of understanding, treatment, and support-to be answered about severe paranoia. Most questions were considered largely equally important. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Numerous questions were identified that, if addressed, might improve clinical provision for persecutory delusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.