Observational studyRespiratory medicine2025
Peripheral airways dysfunction measured by oscillometry differentiates asthma from inducible laryngeal obstruction.
Observational study in Respiratory medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInducible laryngeal obstruction (ILO, also called vocal cord dysfunction) can be difficult to distinguish clinically from asthma. Limited studies have explored the use of respiratory oscillometry to detect changes unique to ILO, but more study is needed to determine if routine oscillometry can differentiate these two clinical entities.
objectiveDetermine if impedance variables measured on routine oscillometry over tidal breathing vary between individuals with asthma and ILO.
methodsSubjects with asthma and ILO were recruited to participate in a single-center, observational study at the University of Rochester Medical Center. Oscillometry measurements were obtained over tidal breathing according to technical standards. Exploratory oscillometry variables were analyzed, as well as standard oscillometry variables including measures of peripheral airways dysfunction.
results25 subjects (12 with asthma and 13 with ILO) were recruited and included in the analysis. Measures of peripheral airways dysfunction including frequency dependence of resistance (R5-R20), area under the reactance curve (AX), and reactance at 5 Hz (X5) were significantly more abnormal in asthma subjects compared to ILO subjects (p = 0.039, p = 0.008, and p = 0.0327 respectively). Resistance at 5 Hz (R5) was not statistically different between asthma and ILO (p = 0.301). Exploratory variables, including inspiratory impedance and the standard deviation of impedance, were not significantly different between asthma and ILO.
conclusionMeasures of peripheral airways dysfunction by oscillometry were significantly different in subjects with asthma compared to ILO and more significant in subjects with poor asthma control. There were no exploratory oscillometry variables that were significantly different between ILO and asthma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.