Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39631536›Full record

Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2025

Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for Care Partners of Persons with Dementia (ICECaP): Feasibility and acceptability.

Ryan C Thompson, Virginia T Gallagher, Shannon E Reilly, Anna M Arp, Carol A Manning

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ryan C ThompsonDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Virginia T GallagherDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA. Electronic address: cdd3me@uvahealth.org.
Shannon E ReillyDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Anna M ArpBrain Institute, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
Carol A ManningDepartment of Neurology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Funding

The integrated Translational Health Research Institute of Virginia (iTHRIV): Using Data to Improve HealthUL1TR003015 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI BROWN, DONALD E, JOHNSTON, KAREN C. · 2019 to 2023
$20.3M
Institutional Career Development CoreKL2TR003016 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA · PI PAPIN, JASON, WORRALL, BRADFORD B · 2019 to 2023
$3.9M
NCATS NIH HHS KL2 TR003016NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR003015
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInformal care partners (CPs) of persons with dementia (PWDs), who are at risk of negative health outcomes, benefit from psychosocial interventions. Individualized Coordination and Empowerment for CPs of PWDs (ICECaP) is a year-long, multi-component intervention comprised of in-person and telehealth psychoeducation and emotional support from dementia care coordinators (DCCs). ICECaP feasibility and acceptability were examined during a pilot randomized controlled trial.

methodFeasibility was determined by study enrollment (relative to screening) and study completion. Acceptability was examined with CP-rated intervention satisfaction and DCC-completed surveys of CP engagement, using one-sample Wilcoxon tests to evaluate differences between observed and null hypothesized medians. Implementation fidelity was also evaluated. Analyses of variance and Chi-square tests identified demographic differences in study completion and DCC-reported CP engagement.

resultsStudy enrollment (91.4 %) and study completion (85.4 %) were both high when compared to findings from a recent meta-analysis of CP psychosocial interventions. Completion was similar across groups (ICECaP vs. control) and demographics. CPs and DCCs communicated twice monthly, most commonly via email. On average, DCCs spent 68 minutes total per CP monthly; the number and duration of contacts varied widely. CPs responded positively on the satisfaction survey, and DCCs mostly responded positively about CP communication, engagement, and responsiveness. Communication was reportedly more difficult with employed CPs and CPs with ≥16 years of education.

conclusionICECaP was both feasible and acceptable. DCC time spent with CPs occurred primarily virtually and varied widely, reflecting both individualization within the intervention and the unpredictability of dementia care for CPs. CLINICALTRIALS: govNCT04495686.

Indexed as

CaregiversDementiaFeasibility StudiesAgedEmpowermentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsPsychosocial InterventionTelemedicineCare coordinatorCaregiverCare partnerDementiaPsychosocial intervention

Identifiers

PMID39631536
PMCPMC11934102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.