Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39631515›Full record

ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2025

Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Ambulation and Wheelchair Transfer Ability in Spina Bifida.

Gina McKernan, Matt Mesoros, Brad E Dicianno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gina McKernanDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA. Electronic address: Gina.mckernan@pitt.edu.
Matt MesorosDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.
Brad E DiciannoDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA; Human Engineering Research Laboratories, VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, Pittsburgh, PA.

Funding

NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001280
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine which statistical techniques enhance our ability to predict ambulation and transfer ability in people with spina bifida (SB).

designRetrospective cohort study.

settingThirty-five US outpatient SB clinic sites.

participantsIndividuals (n=4589) with SB aged 5-73 years (median age=13.59y).

interventionNot applicable.

main outcome measuresAmbulation ability, which consisted of the following categories: community ambulators, household ambulators, therapeutic ambulators, and nonambulators. SECONDARY OUTCOME: Wheelchair transfer ability, as defined by the ability to transfer in and out of a wheelchair unassisted.

resultsA recurrent neural network (RNN) using a multilayer perceptron discarded 76 cases during case processing, resulting in 4513 that were run through the RNN. The predictions in the resulting testing dataset were 83.22% accurate. Recall was 93.21% for community ambulators, 10.00% for household ambulators, 23.96% for therapeutic ambulators, and 76.70% for nonambulators. Precision was 85.34% for community ambulators, 16.05% for household ambulators, 16.67% for therapeutic ambulators, and 93.47% for nonambulators. Total predictions included 68.39% for community ambulators, 2.25% for household ambulators, 3.83% for therapeutic ambulators, and 25.53% for nonambulators. Correspondingly, the model accurately classified 70% of wheelchair transfers while correctly identifying 97.3% of those able to transfer unassisted.

conclusionsRNN models hold promise for the prediction of functional outcomes such as ambulation and transfer ability in people with SB, particularly for community ambulators and nonambulators. Compared with the previous work using traditional logistic regression approaches which misclassified 16% of cases, the RNN resulted in greater prediction accuracy with fewer than 7% of cases misclassified.

Indexed as

Machine LearningSpinal DysraphismWalkingWheelchairsAdolescentAdultAgedAlgorithmsChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeural Networks, ComputerRetrospective StudiesAmbulationMachine learningMyelomeningocelePopulation outcomesRegistriesRehabilitationSpina bifidaSpinal dysraphismTransferWalkingWheelchair

Identifiers

PMID39631515
PMCPMC12048235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.