ArticleArchives of physical medicine and rehabilitation2025
Machine Learning Algorithms for Prediction of Ambulation and Wheelchair Transfer Ability in Spina Bifida.
Article in Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Use of artificial intelligence for outcome assessment in pediatric rehabilitation: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo determine which statistical techniques enhance our ability to predict ambulation and transfer ability in people with spina bifida (SB).
designRetrospective cohort study.
settingThirty-five US outpatient SB clinic sites.
participantsIndividuals (n=4589) with SB aged 5-73 years (median age=13.59y).
interventionNot applicable.
main outcome measuresAmbulation ability, which consisted of the following categories: community ambulators, household ambulators, therapeutic ambulators, and nonambulators. SECONDARY OUTCOME: Wheelchair transfer ability, as defined by the ability to transfer in and out of a wheelchair unassisted.
resultsA recurrent neural network (RNN) using a multilayer perceptron discarded 76 cases during case processing, resulting in 4513 that were run through the RNN. The predictions in the resulting testing dataset were 83.22% accurate. Recall was 93.21% for community ambulators, 10.00% for household ambulators, 23.96% for therapeutic ambulators, and 76.70% for nonambulators. Precision was 85.34% for community ambulators, 16.05% for household ambulators, 16.67% for therapeutic ambulators, and 93.47% for nonambulators. Total predictions included 68.39% for community ambulators, 2.25% for household ambulators, 3.83% for therapeutic ambulators, and 25.53% for nonambulators. Correspondingly, the model accurately classified 70% of wheelchair transfers while correctly identifying 97.3% of those able to transfer unassisted.
conclusionsRNN models hold promise for the prediction of functional outcomes such as ambulation and transfer ability in people with SB, particularly for community ambulators and nonambulators. Compared with the previous work using traditional logistic regression approaches which misclassified 16% of cases, the RNN resulted in greater prediction accuracy with fewer than 7% of cases misclassified.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.