ArticleBlood advances2025
Impact of measurable residual disease clearance kinetics in patients with AML undergoing intensive chemotherapy.
Article in Blood advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Optimal minimal residual disease threshold in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia: A retrospective cohort study based on the TARGET database.PLoS medicine · 2026Article
- Prospective feasibility study of peripheral blood for MRD detection in acute myeloid leukemia by flow cytometry.Blood advances · 2026Article
- Long-term outcomes inHaematologica · 2026Article
- Hijacking the helpers: platelet and neutrophil trafficking in AML and therapeutic exploitation.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2026Review
- Integrating MRD kinetics with allogeneic SCT decisions in AML.Blood advances · 2025Article
- Frontline allo-SCT in MRD-negative, intermediate-risk AML.Blood advances · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
abstractThe prognostic impact of measurable residual disease (MRD) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is unequivocal; however, the optimal time point for achieving undetectable MRD is unclear. We retrospectively studied patients with newly diagnosed (ND) AML who achieved remission with frontline intensive chemotherapy and had MRD assessed by flow cytometry after induction (time point 1 [TP1]) and after cycles 2 or 3 (TP2). Cases were grouped into MRD negative (Neg)/Neg, positive (Pos)/Neg, or Pos/Pos at TP1 and TP2, respectively. Of 1980 patients with ND AML, 277 met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) was 73 months, 22 months, and 5 months for the MRD Neg/Neg, Pos/Neg, and Pos/Pos groups, respectively (P < .01). There was a significant difference between the Neg/Neg and Pos/Neg groups (P = .05), suggesting benefit to early MRD negativity. The median overall survival (OS) was 81 months, 40 months, and 9 months, respectively (P < .01), but the difference between Neg/Neg and Pos/Neg was not statistically significant (P = .19). Landmark analysis demonstrated the benefit of stem cell transplant (SCT), particularly in Neg/Neg intermediate-risk AML (median RFS, not reached vs 15 months; P < .01). On multivariable analysis, MRD Pos/Neg was independently associated with a worse RFS than Neg/Neg (hazard ratio, 1.73; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.75; P = .02) but not for OS (P = .15). In conclusion, undetectable flow MRD after induction is associated with better RFS than undetectable MRD achieved later during consolidation. SCT benefited patients with intermediate-risk AML, regardless of MRD kinetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.