Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39631067›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2024

Investigating the Norwegian eHealth Governance Model: Document Study.

Line Helen Linstad, Hilde Bjørnå, Anne Moen, Truls Tunby Kristiansen, Anne Helen Hansen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Line Helen LinstadDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0011-4123
Hilde BjørnåDepartment of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1091-3896
Anne MoenNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, Tromso, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3825-9355
Truls Tunby KristiansenDepartment of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and Education, UiT the Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0106-1302
Anne Helen HansenDepartment of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2731-6916

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGovernments and policy makers struggle to achieve a balance between hierarchical steering and horizontal governance in systems characterized by fragmented decision authority and multiple interests. To realize its One Citizen-One Journal eHealth policy vision, the Norwegian government established a special eHealth board of stakeholders to create an inclusive governance model that aligned stakeholders' interests with the government's ambitions through coordination and consensus. Little empirical knowledge exists on how countries realize inclusive governance models.

objectiveThis study aims to investigate how the Norwegian inclusive eHealth governance model was developed as a tool to align the government's policy ambitions with stakeholders' concerns from January 2012 to December 2022.

methodsThis document study used a thematic analysis based on a constructivist research approach. We included 16 policy documents and 175 consultation response documents issued between January 2012 and December 2022 related to the Norwegian One Citizen-One Journal policy implementation process. The themes were constructed deductively from a review of governance models and public governance theory and were applied as our analytical lens to each document. The findings were interpreted, analyzed, and synthesized.

resultsThe national policy implementation process progressed through 3 phases, with changes in stakeholder inclusion and perceived influence on the decision-making process characterizing transitions from phase to phase. Tension developed between 2 contrasting views regarding top-down government authority and stakeholders' autonomy. The view of the regional health trusts, municipalities, health care professional organizations, and industry actors contrasted with that of the patient organizations. Governmental insensitivity to participation, lack of transparency, and decreasing trust by stakeholder groups challenged the legitimacy of the inclusive governance model.

conclusionsWe illustrated that Norway's One Citizen-One Journal policy trajectory was characterized by a process that unfolded across 3 distinct phases. The process was characterized by 2 contrasting stakeholder perspectives. Finally, it was shaped by diminishing trust in the inclusive governance model. The National eHealth Governance Board faced challenges in establishing legitimacy as a top-down inclusive governance model, primarily attributed to its addressing of participation, transparency, and trust dilemmas. Such dilemmas represent significant obstacles to inclusive governance models and require ongoing governmental vigilance and responsiveness from governmental entities.

Indexed as

TelemedicineGovernmentHealth PolicyHumansModels, OrganizationalNorwayPolicy Makingbottom-up networkeHealth policyelectronic health recordfragmented decision authorityparticipationtop-down governance

Identifiers

PMID39631067
PMCPMC11656114

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.