ReviewPloS one2024
Coronary embolism in left-sided infective endocarditis. A retrospective analysis from a high-volume surgical centre and review of the literature.
Review in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Early prosthetic valve endocarditis presenting as acute right coronary artery occlusion 1 month after aortic valve replacement: a case report.General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery cases · 2026Article
- Septic coronary embolism presenting as anterior STEMI: a stentless PCI strategy guided by clinical inconsistency and pathological confirmation-case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- The Role of Serum Biomarkers for the Differential Diagnosis and Prognostic Assessment of Myocardial Infarction with Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- A Rare Case of Bacterial Endocarditis Leading to Aortic Valve Insufficiency and Presenting as Myocardial Infarction.Cureus · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSeptic embolization is a common and potentially life-threatening complication of infective endocarditis (IE), with a prevalence of 22-50%. While acute coronary syndrome secondary to septic embolism is rare, it poses significant risks.
aimsThis study examines coronary embolism (CE) in left-sided IE, describing clinical characteristics and outcomes.
methodsWe retrospectively analysed 649 patients with non-device-related left-sided IE treated between January 2013 and December 2023 in a high-volume surgical centre. CE was diagnosed via ECG, clinical and laboratory signs of acute coronary syndrome, and confirmed by coronary angiography or magnetic resonance imaging. All patients were treated according to current European Society of Cardiology guidelines. A structured follow-up was performed.
resultsAmong patients included in the study, surgery was performed in 514 (79%) patients. Median follow-up duration was 4.7 years. CE occurred in 8 (1.2%) patients, and 6 (80%) of them were treated surgically. We found no significant differences in overall mortality rate between patients with or without CE (p = 0.65). Finally, cerebral embolism was significantly more frequent in patients with than without CE (75% vs 25%, p = 0.006, post-hoc power 87.8%).
conclusionCE is a rare but severe complication of IE, significantly associated with cerebral embolism. Early recognition and treatment are crucial to improve patient outcomes. Multicentre studies with larger patient populations are needed to further elucidate risk factors and enhance prognosis for CE in IE patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.