Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39630787›Full record

ArticleRevista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo2024

Instruments for evaluating parental support for the practice of physical activity in children and adolescents: A scoping review.

Naildo Santos Silva, Paulo Henrique Guerra, Paulo Felipe Ribeiro Bandeira, Júlio Brugnara Mello, Adroaldo Gaya

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Naildo Santos SilvaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6585-5307
Paulo Henrique GuerraUniversidade Federal da Fronteira Sul, Chapecó, SC, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4239-0716
Paulo Felipe Ribeiro BandeiraUniversidade Regional do Cariri, Crato, CE, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8260-0189
Júlio Brugnara MelloPontificia Universidad Católica de Valparaíso, Valparíso, Chile.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3013-1760
Adroaldo GayaUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5941-5089

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe objective of this study was to map the instruments used to assess parental support for physical activity and their constructs and psychometric properties. DATA SOURCE: A scoping review was conducted, with searches in seven electronic databases and reference lists, covering articles available until April 2022. Original and cross-sectional studies were sought that used questionnaires, inventories or questions to assess parental support for the practice of physical activity and sports by children and adolescents aged 6 to 17 years and that assessed the barriers reported by parents or guardians for not offering support. DATA SYNTHESIS: Of the initial 1739 articles, 21 made up the synthesis. From a general perspective, 11 studies from 5 continents used a questionnaire or inventory or question to assess parental support; the majority of the samples evaluated were made up of girls and mothers. The intraclass correlation coefficient was the most used measure to evaluate the reliability of the instruments (10 studies). To assess the reliability of the instruments, Cronbach's alpha was the most used measure (13 studies).

conclusionsOnly one instrument was constructed respecting the psychometric properties. Authors are advised to consider the importance of following the instrument validity evidence process when developing or adapting instruments.

Indexed as

ExerciseParentsPsychometricsAdolescentChildFemaleHumansMaleParent-Child RelationsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID39630787
PMCPMC11606595

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.