ArticlePloS one2024
Cost-effectiveness of Left Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) as destination therapy in the UK: An economic modelling study.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Outcomes of Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair in Potentially Favorable Candidates for Left Ventricular Assist Device: Evidence From the OCEAN-Mitral Registry.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Observational
- Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLeft Ventricular Assist Devices (LVADs) for destination therapy (DT) are used in many countries but in some, like the UK, LVADs are not commissioned due to uncertainty around their cost-effectiveness. Existing economic evaluations of LVADs for these patients have limitations. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of LVADs as destination therapy, compared to optimal medical therapy, in the UK.
methodsA cost-utility analysis from a UK healthcare perspective was conducted, using a Markov model. The model incorporated the impact of major events and complications. Sub-group analyses considered different severities of heart failure on cost-effectiveness. Uncertainty was measured in deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses.
resultsLVAD produced additional 2.78 (95% CI 2.46-3.14) QALYs at an incremental cost of £152,329 (95% CI £125,665 - £181,812) compared to medical management, giving an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of £54,748 per QALY. The ICER remained above the accepted thresholds of cost-effectiveness in the UK if a small proportion of patients receiving LVAD becomes eligible for a heart transplant and for all subgroups based on heart failure severity. The deterministic sensitivity analysis showed that the ongoing outpatient costs had a significant impact on the results.
conclusionsOur analysis found that LVADs are not cost-effective as destination therapy in the UK if a willingness to pay threshold of £50,000 per QALY gained or disease severity modifiers, were applied. Robust data on ongoing costs for LVAD and medical management are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.