ArticlePloS one2024
Application of improved ant-lion algorithm for power systems.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimal distributed generation allocation considering renewable and load uncertainties.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
An improved ant-lion algorithm is proposed to solve the load allocation problem to improve the efficiency of load allocation in the power system. The global search capability and optimization performance of the algorithm have been significantly improved by introducing elite weights and chaotic search mechanisms. The innovation of the research lies in not only optimizing economic goals, but also considering environmental goals, achieving dual optimization of economy and environment. The average running time of the proposed algorithm in Sphere function and Griebank function was 2.67s and 1.64s, respectively. The required number of iterations was significantly better than other algorithms. In the verification of solving economic load dispatch, the improved ant-lion optimizer achieved a total fuel cost reduction of 0.10% -2.39% and 6% in both 3-unit and 6-unit simulations, respectively, compared to the other three algorithms. In the verification of solving environmental and economic load dispatch, considering the valve point effect, this proposed optimization scheme had a total fuel cost of 622.46 $/hr and a total emission of 0.20 tons/h. The total objective function was 1542.54 $/hr, which was an average reduction of 53.55 $/hr compared to the other five algorithms. Therefore, improving the ant-lion optimizer can enhance its optimization performance. The improved ant-lion optimizer has positive application significance in power system load dispatch and can achieve superior load dispatch results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.