ArticlePloS one2024
Genetic structure of the commercial stingless bee Heterotrigona itama (Apidae: Meliponini) in Thailand.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Complete mitochondrial genome of the stingless bee Geniotrigona thoracica (Hymenoptera, Apidae, Meliponini): presence of genome duplication, heteroplasmy and inverted repeats.Molecular biology reports · 2026Article
- Anti-cancer activity of propolis extracts from stingless bees of Brunei Darussalam.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Complete Mitochondrial Genome Characterization and Phylogenomics of the Stingless Bee,Insects · 2025Article
- Human-mediated dispersal ofPeerJ · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stingless beekeeping, also known as meliponiculture, has gained increasing popularity in many tropical and subtropical countries for its use in commercial pollination and high-value honey and propolis production. However, this rising interest in stingless beekeeping has led to significant geographical displacements of bee colonies by beekeepers, occasionally surpassing their native ranges. Consequently, this affects local bee populations by disrupting gene flow across unnaturally large geographic scales. For Heterotrigona itama, one of the most common stingless bee species in Southeast Asian countries, including Thailand, there is concern that large-scale artificial propagation by beekeepers utilizing a limited number of bee colonies will lead to inbreeding. This practice leads to increased inbreeding within managed populations and introgression into wild populations. These concerns highlight the need for careful management practices in stingless beekeeping to mitigate potential adverse effects. To assess the genetic structure of H. itama in Thailand, 70 colonies were sampled, and partially sequenced cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 (COI) gene, large ribosomal subunit rRNA gene (16S rRNA), and 28S large ribosomal subunit rDNA gene (28S rRNA) were analyzed. Our results showed slightly lower nuclear genetic variability, but higher mitochondrial genetic variability, which can be attributed to gene flow, colony transport, and nest division. We suggest that increasing the number of colonies maintained through nest division does not negatively affect genetic variability, as it is maintained by small-scale male dispersal and human-mediated nest transport. However, caution should be exercised when transporting nests from distant localities, considering the high genetic differentiation observed between samples from Narathiwat and those from Krabi and Nakhon Si Thammarat provinces, which might indicate local adaptation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.