ReviewPLOS digital health2024
Experiences, impacts, and requirements of synchronous video consultations between nurses, allied health professionals, psychological therapists, and adult service-users: A review of the literature.
Review in PLOS digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTelemedicine is increasingly used within healthcare worldwide. More is known about its efficacy in treating different conditions and its application to different contexts than about service-users' and practitioners' experiences or how best to support implementation.
aimsTo review adult service-users' experiences of synchronous video consultations with nurses, allied health professionals and psychological therapists, find out how consultations impact different groups of service-users and identify requirements for their conduct at individual, organisational, regional, and national levels.
methodCINAHL, Embase, Medline, PsycINFO Scopus were searched for papers published between 01/01/2018 and 19/03/2021. One reviewer independently reviewed citations and a second reviewed those excluded by the first, in a liberal accelerated approach. Quality assessment was undertaken using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool and data were synthesised narratively.
results65 papers were included. Service-users' experiences of video consultations ranged from feelings of connection to disconnection and ease of access to challenges to access. Many were excluded from video consultation services or research, for example because of lack of access to technology. Individual service-users required clear orientation and ongoing technical support, whereas staff needed support to develop technical and online-relational skills. At organisational levels, technology needed to be made available to users through equipment loan or service models such as hub-and-spoke; services required careful planning and integration within organisational systems; and security needed to be assured. Regional and national requirements related to interorganisational cooperation and developing functionality.
conclusionTo support safe and equitable video consultation provision, we recommend: (1) providers and researchers consider how to maximise participation, for example through inclusive consent processes and eligibility criteria; (2) sharing video consultation user guides and technical support documentation; and (3) continuing professional development for practitioners, focusing on the technical and relational skills that service-users value, such as the ability to convey empathy online.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.