ArticlePloS one2024
A Modified Green Star Area (MoGSA) and software to assess greenness of reactions in the chemistry laboratories.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Green Knoevenagel condensation of indolin-2-one derivatives using undivided electrochemical cell.MethodsX · 2026Article
- Spectrofluorimetric quantification of terconazole in pharmaceutical creams with comprehensive sustainability evaluation.BMC chemistry · 2026Article
- Evaluation of six eco-analytical tools for the sustainable HPLC analysis of a quinary anti-cold drug mixture.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- SUSTAIN as a universal scoring tool for assessing sustainability development goals in African energy initiatives.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Green RP-UPLC Method for Simultaneous Determination of Cyclopentolate and Organic Impurities Using DoE and Sustainability Metrics.International journal of analytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The environmental and health impacts of chemical processes have been a growing concern, leading to the establishment of Green Chemistry principles. Introducing new metrics for the assessment of methods' greenness is crucial to evaluate the exerted efforts to conserve the environment. In this work, we introduce a Modified Green Star Area (MoGSA) and software to assess the greenness of chemical reactions in laboratory settings. MoGSA refines the traditional Green Star Area Index (GSAI) by allowing users to selectively apply specific principles of Green Chemistry based on their relevance to the chemical process being evaluated. This approach addresses the limitations of GSAI, which often lacks clear boundaries between green and non-green practices and does not account for the varying applicability of the 12 Green Chemistry principles across different contexts. Through comparative case studies on catalytic stereoselective reduction of acetophenone, MoGSA demonstrates its utility in providing a more refined and flexible assessment, enhancing both educational and industrial applications of sustainable chemical practices. The software is available as an open source at https://bit.ly/MOGSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.