ArticlePloS one2024
Metabolic syndrome patterns by gender in major depressive disorder.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Predictors of Metabolic Syndrome in Polish Women-The Role of Body Composition and Sociodemographic Factors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Prevalence and correlates of suicide attempts in working-age, first-episode, drug-naïve major depressive disorder patients.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Association between the dietary inflammatory index and depressive symptoms in adults with metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study from the NHANES database.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Major depressive disorder (MDD) and metabolic syndrome (MetS) are significant health challenges, with distinct gender-specific manifestations. This suggests that the clinical presentation of MetS within the MDD cohort may also vary by gender. The objective of this study is to explore these gender-specific clinical patterns in the co-occurrence of MetS among hospitalized MDD patients, thereby offering insights and guidance for targeted interventions aimed at managing MetS in this demographic. The study included 1,281 first hospitalization MDD patients. Data were collected on socio-demographic characteristics and general clinical profiles. Metabolic parameters, routine biochemical markers, and psychological symptoms were measured and analyzed. The prevalence of MetS was 8.21% in male patients and 10.34% in female patients, with no significant difference between genders. Gender-specific risk factors were identified: in males, age and anxiety symptoms were significant predictors of MetS, while in females, age at onset and married were linked to the development of MetS. Additionally, MetS severity was influenced by age at onset in males and by both age at onset and married in females. This study found no gender-specific prevalence of MetS in hospitalized MDD patients. However, gender-specific factors influencing MetS development and severity highlight the need for focused management in older, married females and older males with high anxiety symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.