ArticlePopulation health management2024
Identifying Patients with Heart Failure Eligible for Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy.
Article in Population health management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rationale and Design of the Cooperative Program for ImpLementation of Optimal Therapy in Heart Failure.Clinical cardiology · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A majority of patients with heart failure (HF) do not receive adequate medical therapy as recommended by clinical guidelines. One major obstacle encountered by population health management (PHM) programs to improve medication usage is the substantial burden placed on clinical staff who must manually sift through electronic health records (EHRs) to ascertain patients' eligibility for the guidelines. As a potential solution, the study team developed a rule-based system (RBS) that automatically parses the EHR for identifying patients with HF who may be eligible for guideline-directed therapy. The RBS was deployed to streamline a PHM program at Brigham and Women's Hospital wherein the RBS was executed every other month to identify potentially eligible patients for further screening by the program staff. The study team evaluated the performance of the system and performed an error analysis to identify areas for improving the system. Of approximately 161,000 patients who have an echocardiogram in the health system, each execution of the RBS typically identified around 4200 patients. A total 5460 patients were manually screened, of which 1754 were found to be truly eligible with an accuracy of 32.1%. An analysis of the false-positive cases showed that over 38% of the false positives were due to incorrect determination of symptomatic HF and medication history of the patients. The system's performance can be potentially improved by integrating information from clinical notes. The RBS provided a systematic way to narrow down the patient population to a subset that is enriched for eligible patients. However, there is a need to further optimize the system by integrating processing of clinical notes. This study highlights the practical challenges of implementing automated tools to facilitate guideline-directed care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.