Observational studyInfection2025
Embolic complications in a large contemporary cohort of infective endocarditis: do we need score model?
Observational study in Infection, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mind the Gap: Inadequate Performance of Embolic Risk Scores in Infective Endocarditis.Open forum infectious diseases · 2026Article
- Phenotype-Based Stratification and Early Prediction of Staphylococcal Infective Endocarditis: Development of a Pragmatic Bedside Score.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Infective Endocarditis and Complications; Surgical Indications and Management: An Integrative Review.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Review
- Nomogram-based prediction of in-hospital mortality and embolic events in infective endocarditis.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Complex Relationships Between the Hemostasis System and Infective Endocarditis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeInfective endocarditis (IE) is a heterogeneous disease undergoing epidemiological changes. Whether those changes have an impact on the correlates of embolic events (EE) remains unclear. We analyzed the correlates of EE and proposed a diagnostic score model in a large contemporary cohort.
methodsThis is a retrospective observational study including patients with definite valve IE admitted between 2000 and 2023. EE were defined as acute complications causing overt clinical manifestations. The study primary aim was to identify independent correlates of EE.
results715 valve-IE cases were included. EE occurred in 41.4% (n = 296) of patients. S. aureus etiology (OR 2.708[1.268-5.786]; p = 0.010), C-reactive protein > 6.7 mg/dL (OR 2.415[1.371-4.252]; p = 0.002), and splenomegaly (OR 2.858[1.620-5.403]; p < 0.001) were independently associated with EE. VS ≥ 14 mm (OR 1.575[0.925-2.682]; p = 0.061) and D-dimers > 747 ng/mL (OR 1.677[0.976-2.881]; p = 0.061) showed a trend for independent association. These variables were included in a diagnostic score model. A stepwise increase of EE occurrence was found stratifying patients into 3 categories (score 0-2-22%; score 3-5-53%; score 6-8-78%;p < 0.001). A cut-off of 2 (< 2 vs. ≥ 2) showed a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 50% (AUROC 0.732; p < 0.001).
conclusionEE were independently associated to Staphylococcus aureus, C-reactive protein and splenomegaly and less strongly linked to vegetation size in our cohort. These results may be explained by a change in embolic complications correlates linked to the epidemiological shift. The discriminative ability of our score was only fair. At present, clinicians should rely upon clinical and imaging data to diagnose EE.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39630395What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.