ArticleInternal and emergency medicine2025
Effect of traditional Chinese medicine on cardiovascular death and all-cause death among patients with heart failure and/or atrial fibrillation.
Article in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Traditional Chinese medicine challenging conventional Western medicine in cardiovascular diseases?Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We tried to define the association of adverse cardiovascular (CV) events, such as CV death and all-cause death among patients with heart failure (HF) and/or atrial fibrillation (AF) receiving traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) or not. We used data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database in a retrospective cohort study using propensity scoring (PS) matching. We matched 54,859 and 18,307 patients each to the treatment vs. non-treatment group and found a significantly decreased risk of adverse CV events after PS score matching, suggesting that TCM reduces the risk of these adverse outcomes. Compared to HF patients without AF in non-TCM user, HF patients without AF in TCM user and HF patients with AF in TCM user had decreased risk of CV death by 0.50 times (95% CI 0.49, 0.52) and 0.84 times (95% CI 0.49,0.52), respectively. HF patients without AF in TCM user and HF patients with AF in TCM user had decreased risk of all-cause death relative to HF patients without AF in non-TCM user by 0.53 times (95% CI 0.52, 0.54) and 0.74 times (95% CI 0.72,0.76), respectively. The results said that there is significant reduction of decrease in risk of CV death and all death among the patients receiving TCM, especially those without AF.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39630379What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.