Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39630351›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2025

Ensemble representation of animacy could be based on mid-level visual features.

Natalia A Tiurina, Yuri A Markov

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia A Tiurina *Department of Psychology, TUD Dresden University of Technology, Dresden, Germany. nataliatiurina@gmail.com.
Yuri A Markov *Department of Psychology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Studies suggest that mid-level features could underlie object animacy perception. In the current research, we tested whether ensemble animacy perception is based on high- or mid-level features. We used five types of images of animals and inanimate objects: color, grayscale, silhouettes, texforms - unrecognizable images that preserve mid-level texture and shape information - and scrambled images. In the series of Experiments 1, we asked participants to evaluate the animacy of single images and sets of eight images using a 10-point scale. In the series of Experiments 2, participants were shown two sets of eight images and had to choose a more animate one in the two-alternative forced-choice (2AFC) task. We found that in both paradigms, observers could report the mean animacy of the set of texform images without direct access to information about high-level features. Thus, ensemble animacy could be extracted only based on mid-level features such as shape and texture without access to more high-level information.

Indexed as

AttentionForm PerceptionMotion PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualAdultChoice BehaviorColor PerceptionDiscrimination, PsychologicalFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAnimacyEnsemble summary statisticsMid-level features

Identifiers

PMID39630351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.