ArticleApplied biochemistry and biotechnology2025
Effect of Sodium Alginate-Bulk Chitosan/Chitosan Nanoparticle Wall Matrix on the Viability of Lactobacillus plantarum Under Simulated Gastrointestinal Fluids.
Article in Applied biochemistry and biotechnology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Probiotics in Pet Food: A Decade of Research, Patents, and Market Trends.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The viability of probiotic cells decreases during passage through the gastrointestinal tract. The process of probiotics encapsulation with sodium alginate and chitosan polymers was carried out to protect the Lactobacillus plantarum in adverse conditions. Lactobacillus plantarum was entrapped in sodium alginate/chitosan (SA/BChi) and sodium alginate/nano-chitosan (SA/NChi) wall materials. Encapsulating L. plantarum with SA/BChi and SA/NChi resulted in a high encapsulation efficiency % of ~ 86.41 to 91.09%. In addition, coating bacteria cells in encapsulants improved the survivability of the cells under the simulated gastrointestinal fluids by ~ 52.61% in SA/Chi and 58.04% in SA/NChi compared to 29% for unencapsulated forms. Probiotic beads under field emission-scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM) were morphologically compact with a cracked appearance of SA/NChi beads. The Fourier transform-infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR) and differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) showed vigorous electrostatic interaction between polymers, as well as the high melting points, which corroborate the previous investigations in the field for using SA/BChi or SA/NChi as a promising encapsulating agent for ameliorating the survivability of probiotics under harsh conditions. The distinctive properties possessed by the two coatings make them excellent candidates for use as polymeric carriers in probiotic delivery systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39630335What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.