ArticleEnvironmental monitoring and assessment2024
Abundance of fecal indicator bacteria and diversity of Escherichia coli associated with poultry farms and pasture land cover in streams of northwestern South Carolina.
Article in Environmental monitoring and assessment, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Livestock can contribute fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) to waterbodies. However, few studies have examined the relationship between watershed land use or land cover involving livestock production and the genetic diversity of Escherichia coli in freshwater ecosystems. Our major goal was to determine if FIB abundance and E. coli phylogenetic group distributions in headwater streams are related to livestock production in rural watersheds in South Carolina. In both 2017 and 2018, grab samples were collected from streams at summer baseflow. In 2017, we collected samples from watersheds with or without poultry rearing facilities (PRFs). In 2018, we collected samples from streams draining watersheds with mixed forest and pasture cover and from streams in mostly forested watersheds. In both summers, we measured concentrations of total coliforms, E. coli, and Enterococcus. We also categorized E. coli isolates into one of four phylogenetic groups (A, B1, B2, D). Streams with PRFs in their watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of Enterococcus but not total coliforms or E. coli than streams in watersheds without PRFs. Also, B2 isolates were less frequent and B1 isolates were more frequent in watersheds with PRFs than in those without. Streams draining mixed forest/pasture watersheds had significantly higher concentrations of total coliforms and E. coli but not Enterococcus, as well as higher frequencies of B1 isolates, than streams in mostly forested watersheds. Overall, the most frequent E. coli phylogenetic groups in watersheds with animal production appeared consistent with the phylogenetic groups that are especially abundant in poultry or mammalian livestock feces.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.