ArticleDiscover oncology2024
Prognostic value of preoperative D-dimer to albumin ratio in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.
Article in Discover oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prognostic utility of perineural invasion in individuals with rectal cancer receiving neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy: a meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Preoperative albumin to carcinoembryonic antigen ratio predicts clinicopathological features and survival in colorectal cancer: a prognostic nomogram study.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe prognostic value of Albumin and D-dimer has been established for multiple tumor types, indicating their potential for predicting tumor development. Nevertheless, the predictive capability of the DDI-to-albumin ratio (DAR) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains uncertain. PURPOSE: The objective of this study was to investigate the prognostic significance of the DAR in LARC.
methodsA total of 513 patients who underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) prior to total mesorectal excision (TME) between March 2013 to October 2019 were included in this study. Patients were divided into high-level DAR (> 0.016) or low-level DAR (≤ 0.016) groups based on ROC curve analysis optimum cut-off value. The prognostic value of the DAR in LARC was analyzed.
resultsThe study enrolled 513 patients. Patients were stratified into high-level DAR (> 0.016) and low-level DAR (≤ 0.016) cohorts according to the optimal cut-off value determined by ROC curve analysis. The 5-year overall survival (OS) rates for patients in the low DAR group (≤ 0.016) and the high DAR group (> 0.016) were 89.4% and 80.9%, respectively (p = 0.013). The 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rates were 85.7% and 77.4% (p = 0.027). Multivariate analyses demonstrated that DAR were independent prognostic factors for OS (p = 0.02) and DFS (0.025). Predictive nomograms that included the DAR score group (C-index: OS-0.743, DFS-0.705) were superior to those without DAR scores (C-index: OS-0.721, DFS-0.697).
conclusionThe DAR demonstrates high usability and prognostic value in predicting OS and DFS outcomes among patients diagnosed with LARC who undergo nCRT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.