ArticlePediatric radiology2025
Real-world impact of high-pitch helical CT on radiation exposure and image quality in infants being evaluated for cardiothoracic pathologies.
Article in Pediatric radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvaluation of cardiothoracic pathologies is a common indication for computed tomography (CT) in infants. However, CT is fraught with challenges specific to the patient population, such as increased sensitivity to radiation and inability to remain stationary during imaging.
objectiveThis study investigates potential advantages of a high-pitch helical CT protocol for infants with cardiothoracic pathologies. Namely, we evaluate whether a high-pitch helical CT protocol can minimize radiation exposure without compromising image quality. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study included 98 consecutive cardiac protocol CT examinations of infants (56 males, 42 females; mean age 3.3 ± 2.8 months) performed at a tube voltage of 80 kV between 2016 and 2022. Forty-seven examinations were acquired with a non-gated conventional helical protocol on a multi-detector CT scanner (control group) and 51 were acquired with a non-gated high-pitch helical protocol on a dual-source CT scanner (high-pitch (HP) group). Patient characteristics, radiation exposure parameters, and imaging datasets were extracted from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS). Image quality was assessed subjectively by two radiologists who independently assigned ratings, and objectively through attenuation measurements.
resultsRadiation exposure was approximately 75% lower in the HP group (0.54 mSv vs. 2.46 mSv, P < .001). HP examinations demonstrated comparable, or better, image quality across all metrics in both subjective and objective analyses. In the subjective analysis, the HP group achieved superior ratings for visualization of the aorta (P = .04). In the objective analysis, the HP group achieved superior signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in the left atrium (P < .001), left ventricle (P = .04), and aorta (P = .003), and superior contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) in the left atrium (P = .003) and aorta (P = .009).
conclusionOur findings suggest that employing high-pitch helical CT protocols for evaluation of cardiothoracic pathologies in infants decreases radiation exposure while achieving similar to slightly better image quality compared to conventional helical CT protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39630241What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.