ArticleBreast cancer (Tokyo, Japan)2025
A 5-year review of genomic medicine in breast cancer: insights from C-CAT data on 3776 Japanese patients.
Article in Breast cancer (Tokyo, Japan), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Genomic Landscape and Therapeutic Implications of Metaplastic Breast Carcinoma: Insights from a Nationwide Database Including Diagnostic Mimickers.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn Japan, despite 5 years since CGP tests were covered by insurance in 2019, low drug accessibility rates remain a critical issue. We evaluated drug accessibility in 3776 breast cancer from the C-CAT database using two criteria: the proportion first linked to PMDA-approved drugs with phase III trial evidence for breast cancer through CGP tests but not existing Companion diagnostics [CDx] (*), and the proportion first linked to PMDA-approved drugs including based on phase I and II trial evidence (**). Additionally, cases linked to investigational drugs for non-PMDA-approved drugs were counted.
methodsWe identified the top 100 genetic alterations in Japanese breast cancer via CGP tests, listing corresponding drugs from C-CAT reports. Drug accessibility was re-evaluated through simulations with updated evidence levels by a member of the expert panel at Osaka University (EP-EL in OUH).
resultsResults showed the proportion improved to 28.4% under the newest EP-EL in OUH, including 3.4% for HER2-negative cases eligible for HER2-targeted therapy due to ERBB2 amplification and 25.0% for ER-positive, HER2-negative cases eligible for capivasertib-fulvestrant therapy due to PIK3CA, AKT1, and PTEN alterations (*). However, in part, initial false negatives for HER2 status and practical difficulties in using CGP tests as a CDx for capivasertib exist. Including mutations like TMB-H, MSI-H, BRAF V600E mutation, and NTRK fusions raised the proportion to 37.9% (**), but lacking drugs with phase III trials evidence.
conclusionThese findings highlight the ongoing difficulties in demonstrating clear clinical utility of CGP tests in Japan, emphasizing the need for broad discussions on its future direction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39630210What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.