Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39630200›Full record

ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Bipolar radiofrequency track cautery during abdominal biopsies: teaching points and lessons learned.

Jennifer Huang, Ravi V Gottumukkala, Sharath K Bhagavatula, Raul N Uppot, Borna E Dabiri, Vincent Wu, Ashraf Thabet, Paul B Shyn

Abstract readReviewCase Reports
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jennifer HuangBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Ravi V GottumukkalaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Sharath K BhagavatulaBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Raul N UppotMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Borna E DabiriBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA.
Vincent WuMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Ashraf ThabetMassachusetts General Hospital, Boston, USA.
Paul B ShynBrigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA. pshyn@bwh.harvard.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abdominal percutaneous needle biopsies are commonly performed minimally invasive procedures to obtain tissue samples for histopathological diagnosis. Severe post-biopsy bleeding is uncommon but can be associated with prolonged hospitalization, additional interventions, morbidity, and death. Many factors may increase bleeding risk and various peri-procedural and intra-procedural strategies may minimize bleeding risk. Bipolar radiofrequency track cautery is one method that may reduce the risk of post-biopsy bleeding or tumor seeding. This paper offers an illustrative case-based review of teaching points and lessons learned in our experience using a commercially available bipolar radiofrequency track cautery device during percutaneous image-guided abdominal biopsies.

Indexed as

AbdomenCauteryImage-Guided BiopsyFemaleHumansCauteryNeedle biopsyRadiofrequency ablationTrack cautery

Identifiers

PMID39630200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.