ArticlePediatrics2025
Equity-Focused Interventions Improve Interpreter Use in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.
Article in Pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geographical and Language-Based Factors Associated with Neurodevelopmental Follow-Up in Children with Congenital Heart Disease.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Article
- Increasing Interpreter Use for Pediatric Cardiology Units: A Quality Improvement Initiative.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundFederal guidelines and equitable care mandate that patients who use a language other than English receive interpretation in their preferred language. Substantial variability exists in interpreter use in intensive care settings. We aimed to increase the rate of interpretations in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) through a series of targeted interventions.
methodsA multidisciplinary team developed a key driver diagram to identify areas for focused intervention. Each plan-do-study-act cycle informed the next cycle of interventions, targeting increasing interpreter (video, phone, and in-person) use. Interventions included standardizing technology, standardizing placement of interpretation devices in patient rooms, provider education, and creating accountability systems of interpreter use by care providers. We reviewed data from PICU encounters between January 2018 and January 2022 and used summary statistics and statistical process control methods to measure the impact of our interventions.
resultsWe analyzed 882 patient encounters over the 4-year study period. Demographic characteristics were similar in the preintervention and postintervention periods. The total interpretation rate increased to 2.7 interpretations per patient per day from a baseline rate of 1.4. Each individual interpretation modality demonstrated increases in use. Average time spent interpreting via phone increased from 8 to 10.5 minutes per patient per day, and average time spent interpreting via video went from 9.5 to 22 minutes per patient per day.
conclusionsIterative quality improvement methodology effectively identified barriers to equitable care, guided development of focused interventions, and improved interpreter use among pediatric patients who were critically ill.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.