Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629929›Full record

ArticlePediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology2024

Association of urinary eosinophilic protein X at age 3 years and subsequent persistence of wheezing and asthma diagnosis in adolescence.

Iso Precious Oloyede, Anhar Ullah, Clare S Murray, Sara Fontanella, Angela Simpson, Adnan Custovic

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Association of urinary eosinophilic protein X at age 3 years and subsequent persistence of wheezing and asthma diagnosis in adolescence.Pediatric allergy and immunology : official publication of the European Society of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Iso Precious OloyedeNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Anhar UllahNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Clare S MurrayDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Sara FontanellaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Angela SimpsonDivision of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, Manchester Academic Health Sciences Centre, University of Manchester and University Hospital of South Manchester NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK.
Adnan CustovicNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-7071

Funding

Asthma UKBMA James TrustJP Moulton Charitable FoundationManchester Biomedical Research CentreMedical Research CouncilNIHR Imperial Biomedical Research CentreThe North West Lung Centre Charity
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWheezing is common in early life, but most children stop wheezing by school age. However, the prediction of course of wheezing through childhood is difficult.

objectiveTo investigate whether urinary EPX (a marker of eosinophil activation) in children at age 3 years may be useful for the prediction of wheeze persistence and future asthma diagnosis.

methodsU-EPX was measured at age 3 years (radioimmunoassay) in 906 participants in the population-based birth cohort. Children attended follow-ups to age 16 years. We investigate the discriminative ability of u-EPX and other factors in predicting asthma diagnosis at age 16 using receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curves.

resultsOf 613 children with follow-up information at age 16, 511 had data on u-EPX at age 3 and asthma diagnosis at age 16 years; of those; 133 (21.7%) had asthma. Based on longitudinal data, children were assigned to wheeze clusters: No wheeze (NWZ), early transient (ETW), late-onset (LOW), intermittent (INT) and persistent wheeze (PEW). U-EPX levels differed significantly between different wheeze clusters (p = .003), with clusters characterised with persistent symptoms having higher u-EPX. In the whole cohort, the best performing classification model for asthma diagnosis at age 16 years included sex, u-EPX, sensitisation and wheeze (area under the curve (AUC) = 0.82, 95% CI: 0.76-0.88). u-EPX and allergic sensitisation alone had similar predictive power (AUC [95%CI]: 0.64 [0.58-0.71] and 0.65 [0.60-0.71]). The best performing classification model for asthma prediction among children with doctor-confirmed wheeze in the first 3 years included child's u-EPX and sensitisation at age 3 years, sex, gestational age and maternal atopy (AUC: 0.76, 95%CI: 0.67-0.85).

conclusionsEarly-life u-EPX may be a useful non-invasive marker for asthma prediction in adolescence.

Indexed as

AsthmaBiomarkersRespiratory SoundsAdolescentChild, PreschoolCohort StudiesEosinophilsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleROC CurveBiomarkersasthma predictionpreschool wheezeurinary eosinophilic protein Xwheeze phenotypes

Identifiers

PMID39629929
PMCPMC11616470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.