Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629750›Full record

ArticleClinical obesity2025

Tier 2 adult weight management services in the UK: A case study evaluation of local authority provision of targeted services for higher-risk groups in England.

Lorraine McSweeney, Charlotte Rothwell, Ashley Adamson, Simon Barrett, Claire Mathews, Scott Lloyd, Mackenzie Fong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical obesity, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Lorraine McSweeneyPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1044-6201
Charlotte RothwellPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Ashley AdamsonPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Simon BarrettPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Claire MathewsDepartment of Health and Social Care, Office for Health Improvement and Disparities, London, UK.
Scott LloydPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Mackenzie FongPopulation Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7237-9038

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC) North East and North Cumbria NIHR200173North East Commissioning Service (NECS)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In 2021, the UK Government announced additional funding in England for Adult Weight Management Services (AWMS); it was specified that the extra funding must be used to commission or extend existing tier 2 services. The Office for Health Improvement and Disparities encouraged commissioners to prioritise services for higher-risk groups such as those with learning disabilities, severe mental illness, people from minority ethnic groups, those living in deprived areas and men. To better understand the findings from previous survey work and to explore the implementation of targeted services in greater depth, we undertook a multiple case study comprising eight tier 2 adult weight management service providers and 35 individual stakeholder interviewees. Using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research as an interview guide and in data analysis, we determined key enablers and barriers to successful service provision and programme implementation. Good practice for successful AWMS provision for higher-risk groups includes, having an existing programme in place that can be adapted, ensuring adequate time for programme development/implementation, having good existing networks/partnerships, collaborative working and putting the target group at the heart of any intervention. The findings from this work provide practical recommendations for policy and practice when targeting tier 2 services for higher-risk groups.

Indexed as

ObesityWeight Reduction ProgramsAdultEnglandFemaleHumansMalehigh risk groupstier 2 servicesweight management services

Identifiers

PMID39629750
PMCPMC11907090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.