Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629498›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in organ transplantation2025

Ensuring equity in psychosocial risk assessment for solid organ transplantation: a review.

Joy E Obayemi, Brian I Shaw, Goni-Katz Greenberg, Jackie Henson, Lisa M McElroy

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in organ transplantation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Joy E ObayemiDepartment of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Brian I ShawDepartment of Surgery.
Goni-Katz GreenbergDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Jackie HensonDepartment of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Lisa M McElroyDepartment of Surgery.

Funding

Transplant Surgery Scientist Training ProgramT32DK077662 · NIDDK · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Richard M Green, Daniela P Ladner · 2007 to 2026
$3.8M
NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK077662
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis review summarizes the different instruments for evaluating the psychosocial health of transplant candidates, the evidence demonstrating how these instruments relate to probability of transplant waitlisting and transplant outcomes, and the critical knowledge gaps that exist in the causal pathway between psychosocial health and clinical transplant trajectory. RECENT

findingsThe current literature reveals that psychosocial assessments are a common reason for racial and ethnic minorities to be denied access to the transplant list. Given evidence that a lack of clinician consensus exists regarding the definition of, importance of, and reproducibility of psychosocial support evaluations, this facet of the holistic evaluation process may create a unique challenge for already vulnerable patient populations. Though recent evidence shows that psychosocial evaluation scores predict select transplant outcomes, these findings remain inconsistent. SUMMARY: Multiple instruments for psychosocial transplant evaluation exist, though the utility of these instruments remains uncertain. As equity becomes an increasingly urgent priority for the transplant system, rigorous interrogation of the causal pathway between psychosocial health and transplant longevity is still needed.

Indexed as

Healthcare DisparitiesOrgan TransplantationWaiting ListsEthnic and Racial MinoritiesHealth EquityHealth Services AccessibilityHealth Status DisparitiesHumansMental HealthRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsTreatment OutcomeVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID39629498
PMCPMC11960841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.