Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629486›Full record

ArticleChemical science2025

Reassessing the role and lifetime of Q

Erika Keil, Ajeet Kumar, Lena Bäuml, Sebastian Reiter, Erling Thyrhaug, Simone Moser, Christopher D P Duffy, Regina de Vivie-Riedle, Jürgen Hauer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Chemical science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Erika KeilTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Department of Chemistry Lichtenbergstrasse 4 85748 Garching Germany juergen.hauer@tum.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0164-9138
Ajeet KumarTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Department of Chemistry Lichtenbergstrasse 4 85748 Garching Germany juergen.hauer@tum.de.
Lena BäumlDepartment of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Butenandtstr. 11 81377 Munich Germany.
Sebastian ReiterDepartment of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Butenandtstr. 11 81377 Munich Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7381-4222
Erling ThyrhaugTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Department of Chemistry Lichtenbergstrasse 4 85748 Garching Germany juergen.hauer@tum.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8634-9606
Simone MoserInstitute of Pharmacy, Department of Pharmacognosy, University of Innsbruck Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3415-3673
Christopher D P DuffyDigital Environment Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London London E1 4NS UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6462-8495
Regina de Vivie-RiedleDepartment of Chemistry, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München Butenandtstr. 11 81377 Munich Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7877-5979
Jürgen HauerTechnical University of Munich, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Department of Chemistry Lichtenbergstrasse 4 85748 Garching Germany juergen.hauer@tum.de.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6874-6138

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlorophylls are photoactive molecular building blocks essential to most photosynthetic systems. They have comparatively simple optical spectra defined by states with near-orthogonal transition dipole moments, referred to as B

Identifiers

PMID39629486
PMCPMC11610765

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.