Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629471›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V2024

Genetic diagnosis of the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes.

Johannes Zschocke, Serwet Demirdas, Fleur S van Dijk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical Variability of Classical Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome: A Family with RareInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. [Hypermobility-Importance in rheumatology].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Johannes ZschockeMedical University Innsbruck Institute of Human Genetics Peter-Mayr-Str. 1 6020 Innsbruck Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-8274
Serwet DemirdasErasmus Medical Centre Department of Clinical Genetics Dr. Molewaterplein 40 3015 Rotterdam Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5496-4153
Fleur S van DijkLondon North West University Health Care NHS Trust National EDS service Watford Road HA1 3UJ Harrow United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6341-169X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) represent a group of genetically diverse disorders characterized by the variable combination of joint hypermobility, hyperextensibility of the skin, and connective tissue fragility affecting the skin and other organs. Based on clinical features, 13 different types of EDS have been delineated, 12 of which represent monogenic conditions caused by pathogenic variants in 21 confirmed genes. Pathogenesis is related to disturbances of collagen formation and/or stability. No monogenic cause has been identified for hypermobile EDS (hEDS), a more common EDS type, which is unlikely to represent a single gene disorder in the majority of affected individuals and at present cannot be diagnosed by genetic investigations. Here we summarize the clinical features and the molecular bases of the monogenic EDS types, highlight diagnostic challenges, and provide guidance for the molecular work-up of affected individuals. In general, genetic tests are indicated if clinical features suggest a monogenic EDS type but are usually unrewarding for other cases of hypermobility.

Indexed as

EDSEhlers-Danlos syndromegene panelgenetic testinghypermobilityorgan ruptureskin fragilityskin hyperextensibility

Identifiers

PMID39629471
PMCPMC11610442

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.