Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629459›Full record

ArticleMedizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V2024

Clinical diagnosis of the monogenic Ehlers-Danlos syndromes.

Fleur S van Dijk, Chloe Angwin, Serwet Demirdas, Neeti Ghali, Johannes Zschocke

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medizinische Genetik : Mitteilungsblatt des Berufsverbandes Medizinische Genetik e.V, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fleur S van DijkLondon North West University Health Care NHS Trust National EDS service, London North West University Health Care, NHS Trust Watford Road HA1 3UJ Harrow United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6341-169X
Chloe AngwinLondon North West University Health Care NHS Trust National EDS service Watford Road HA1 3UJ Harrow United Kingdom.
Serwet DemirdasErasmus Medical Centre Department of Clinical Genetics Dr. Molewaterplein 40 3015 Rotterdam Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5496-4153
Neeti GhaliImperial College London Department of Metabolism, Digestion and Reproduction, Section of Genetics and Genomics SW7 2AZ London United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2847-1376
Johannes ZschockeMedical University Innsbruck Institute of Human Genetics Peter-Mayr-Str. 1 6020 Innsbruck Austria.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0046-8274

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monogenic Ehlers-Danlos syndromes (EDS) are a group of inherited connective tissue conditions that are clinically characterised by joint hypermobility, skin hyperextensibility and/or fragility, and generalised tissue fragility. Gene panel testing with massively parallel sequencing is currently gold standard to confirm diagnoses of the monogenic EDS types. We aim to report on the (combination of) clinical features of the monogenic EDS types through text and photographs, to aid clinical diagnosis as despite the significant progress in genetic testing possibilities, a thorough clinical assessment which includes medical history, family history and physical examination remains important in the diagnostic process. In addition, in those cases where no molecular diagnosis is possible, a clinical diagnosis can still guide management and surveillance.

Indexed as

Clinical geneticsCollagenEhlers-Danlos SyndromesExtracellular matrix

Identifiers

PMID39629459
PMCPMC11610443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.