Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629369›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Can tele-physiotherapy help in filling treatment gaps during pandemics in multiple sclerosis?

Gunjan Kumar, Darshpreet Kaur, Ajay Kumar Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gunjan KumarDepartment of Neurology, Patna Medical College and Hospital, Patna, Bihar, India.
Darshpreet KaurDepartment of Physiotherapy, Bihar Neuro, Rukanpura, Patna, Bihar, India.
Ajay Kumar SinghDepartment of Neurology, Bihar Neuro, Rukanpura, Patna, Bihar, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Published data demonstrate promising results for rehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), including telerehabilitation technologies. Given the travel limitations during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), telerehabilitation may provide a viable alternative to in-person physiotherapy. Objective: To determine the efficacy of telerehabilitation in MS patients during COVID-19. Design/Methods: A total of 42 patients participated in the study of which 24 were followed up till the end of 6 weeks. The investigated group consisted of 15 females and 09 males; the mean age was 42 ± 10 years. The telerehabilitation was provided for a duration of 6 weeks at a frequency of three classes per week. The patients used either laptops or mobile phones for attending these sessions. The inclusion criteria were a 6-minute walk test (with or without assistance). Motor function was evaluated using the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test and the 30-Second Sit-to-Stand (30STS) test. Patients were required to fill out two questionnaires also: 12-item MS Walking Scale (MSWS) and Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS). All the patient assessments were made by an independent physiotherapist before and after the intervention. Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in motor performance and MFIS and 12-item MSWS. The following results were observed: statistically improved parameters of TUG, 30STS, 12-item MSWS and MFIS. Conclusions: Based on the findings, it is reasonable to infer that the use of telemedicine in the rehabilitation of MS patients is very promising.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicIndiamultiple sclerosistelerehabilitationvirtual physiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID39629369
PMCPMC11610888

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.