Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629359›Full record

ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024

Female cancer screening in India: Results from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) and the way forward.

Sivakami Sundari Subramanian, Binukumar Bhaskarapillai, Radhakrishnan Jayakrishnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Decomposing Oral Cancer Screening Inequalities Across Wealth Index among Indian Women Aged 30-49 Years: Findings From National Family Health Survey-5.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Sivakami Sundari SubramanianTele MANAS National Apex Centre, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Binukumar BhaskarapillaiDepartment of Biostatistics, NIMHANS, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.
Radhakrishnan JayakrishnanDivision of Community Oncology, Regional Cancer Centre, Trivandrum, Kerala, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of cancer is increasing in India, reflecting global trends. This study attempts to identify various socioeconomic factors associated with breast and cervical cancer screening in females aged 30-49 years using the National Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5) data. Data focused on sociodemographic variables, cancer awareness, and information on breast and cervical cancer screening. Poisson regression was used to identify factors and reported adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The proportion of women who had undergone breast and cervical cancer screening all over India was 0.9% and 1.9%, respectively. Socioeconomic factors seem to play a role as the poor and middle wealth index groups were less likely to undertake breast (APR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.37, 0.99) and cervical cancer (APR = 0.68; 95%CI: 0.51, 0.92) screening compared to the wealthier groups. Moreover, 43% of participants in the poor wealth index category had not undergone cervical cancer screening (APR = 0.57; 95%CI: 0.33, 0.96). Further, women who watched messages on visual media were more likely to undergo screening for breast (APR = 2.00; 95%CI: 1.12, 3.57) and cervical cancer (APR = 1.46; 95%CI: 1.18, 1.82) within a week. In conclusion, screening for cancer among Indian females is remarkably low, which highlights the need for a uniform protocol for message dissemination on cancer and to collect information based on risk assessment. Furthermore, the negligible community participation in cancer screening points to the potential role of sociodemographic characteristics in taking up cancer screening, which was reflected in less participation among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.

Indexed as

Adjusted prevalence ratiocancer screeningNFHS 5 surveyPoisson regressionsampling weight

Identifiers

PMID39629359
PMCPMC11610822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.