ArticleJournal of family medicine and primary care2024
Female cancer screening in India: Results from the National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5) and the way forward.
Article in Journal of family medicine and primary care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cancer screening uptake and tobacco-alcohol use among women in Uttarakhand: A district-wise analysis from the 5th National Family Health Survey (NFHS-5).The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Article
- Oral cancer screening in India: Insights from the National Family Health Survey-5.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Knowledge among parents of daughters towards human papillomavirus attending rural and urban health and training centres of a teaching medical institution in India.Journal of family medicine and primary care · 2025Article
- Review
- Decomposing Oral Cancer Screening Inequalities Across Wealth Index among Indian Women Aged 30-49 Years: Findings From National Family Health Survey-5.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social MedicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The incidence of cancer is increasing in India, reflecting global trends. This study attempts to identify various socioeconomic factors associated with breast and cervical cancer screening in females aged 30-49 years using the National Family Health Survey-5 (NFHS-5) data. Data focused on sociodemographic variables, cancer awareness, and information on breast and cervical cancer screening. Poisson regression was used to identify factors and reported adjusted prevalence ratio (APR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). The proportion of women who had undergone breast and cervical cancer screening all over India was 0.9% and 1.9%, respectively. Socioeconomic factors seem to play a role as the poor and middle wealth index groups were less likely to undertake breast (APR = 0.60; 95%CI: 0.37, 0.99) and cervical cancer (APR = 0.68; 95%CI: 0.51, 0.92) screening compared to the wealthier groups. Moreover, 43% of participants in the poor wealth index category had not undergone cervical cancer screening (APR = 0.57; 95%CI: 0.33, 0.96). Further, women who watched messages on visual media were more likely to undergo screening for breast (APR = 2.00; 95%CI: 1.12, 3.57) and cervical cancer (APR = 1.46; 95%CI: 1.18, 1.82) within a week. In conclusion, screening for cancer among Indian females is remarkably low, which highlights the need for a uniform protocol for message dissemination on cancer and to collect information based on risk assessment. Furthermore, the negligible community participation in cancer screening points to the potential role of sociodemographic characteristics in taking up cancer screening, which was reflected in less participation among socioeconomically disadvantaged groups.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.