ArticleJournal of pediatric intensive care2024
A Novel Situational Awareness Scoring System in Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care Unit Patients.
Article in Journal of pediatric intensive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sustainability of a PICU Situation Awareness Intervention: A Qualitative Study.Pediatric quality & safetyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to describe the performance of a novel Situational Awareness Scoring System (SASS) in discriminating between patients who had cardiac arrest (CA), and those who did not, in a pediatric cardiac intensive care unit (PCICU). This is a retrospective, observational-cohort study in a quaternary-care PCICU. Patients who had CA in the PCICU between January 2014 and December 2018, and patients admitted to the PCICU in 2018 who did not have CA were included. Patients with do not resuscitate or do not intubate orders, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, ventricular assist device, and PCICU stay < 2 hours were excluded. SASS score statistics were calculated within 2-, 4-, 6-, and 8-hour time intervals counting backward from the time of CA, or end of PCICU stay in patients who did not have CA. Cross-validated discrete time logistic regression models were used to calculate area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) curves. Odds ratios (ORs) for CA were calculated per unit increase of the SASS score. Twenty-eight CA events were analyzed in 462 PCICU admissions from 267 patients. Maximum SASS score within 4-hour time interval before CA achieved the highest AUC of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86-0.96) compared with maximum SASS score within 2-, 6-, and 8-hour time intervals before CA of 0.88 (0.79-96), 0.90 (0.85-0.95), and 0.89 (0.83-0.95), respectively. A cutoff value of 60 for maximum SASS score within 4-hour time interval before CA resulted in 82.1 and 83.2% of sensitivity and specificity, respectively. OR for CA was 1.32 (95% CI: 1.26-1.39) for every 10 units increase in the maximum SASS score within each 4-hour time interval before CA. The maximum SASS score within various time intervals before CA achieved promising performance in discriminating patients regarding occurrence of CA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.