ArticleNature and science of sleep2024
Research on Sleep Staging Based on Support Vector Machine and Extreme Gradient Boosting Algorithm.
Article in Nature and science of sleep, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond the Sleep Lab: A Narrative Review of Wearable Sleep Monitoring.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- An EEG-based machine learning framework for diagnosing acute sleep deprivation.Frontiers in physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a sleep-staging algorithm based on support vector machine (SVM) and extreme gradient boosting model (XB Boost) and evaluate its performance. Methods: In this study, data features were extracted based on physiological significance, feature dimension reduction was performed through appropriate methods, and XG Boost classifier and SVM were used for classification. One hundred and twenty training sets and 80 test sets were randomly composed of the first 200 groups of data from the SHH1 database. The polysomnography (PSG) data of 20 real individuals in the clinic were selected as the experimental data. The C3 electroencephalogram (EEG), left and right electrooculogram (EOG), electromyogram (EMG), and other signals were analyzed. Finally, the stages were adjusted based on human sleep laws. The standard staging of the database and the doctor's diagnosis staging was used as the standard. Results: The SHHS1 database test results were as follows: the average accuracy was 83.24%, the precision and recall of Stage Wake and Stage 2 NREM sleep (N2) were over 80%, and the precision, F1-Score and recall of Stage 3 NREM sleep (N3) and Rapid Eye Movement (REM) were more than 70%. The clinical data test results were as follows: the average accuracy rate was 76.37%; for Wake and N3, the precision reached 85%; for Wake, N2, and REM, the recall rate reached over 70%; for Wake, the F-1 Score reached over 90%. Conclusion: This study shows that the sleep staging results of the algorithm for the database and clinical data were similar. The staging results meet the requirements at the medical level.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.