Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39629207›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024

Effect of fit-for-purpose biochars on rumen fermentation, microbial communities, and methane production in cattle.

Gonzalo Martinez-Fernandez, Robert D Kinley, Wendy J M Smith, Jessica Simington, Stephen Joseph, Sara Tahery, Zoey Durmic, Phil Vercoe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Gonzalo Martinez-FernandezAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Robert D KinleyAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Wendy J M SmithAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, St Lucia, QLD, Australia.
Jessica SimingtonAgriculture and Food, CSIRO, Townsville, QLD, Australia.
Stephen JosephSchool of Materials Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Sara TaherySchool of Materials Science and Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Zoey DurmicSchool of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.
Phil VercoeSchool of Agriculture and Environment, The University of Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Biochar has gained significant attention as a possible anti-methanogenic supplement for ruminants due to its potential to reduce methane (CH₄) emissions from enteric fermentation. However, its effects on rumen methanogenesis have been inconsistent and, in some cases, contradictory. These variations are likely influenced by factors such as the type of biochar used, its source material, and how it is administered, including the form in which it is provided and the dosage needed to achieve desired outcomes. This study aimed to examine the effects of two fit-for-purpose biochars on rumen fermentation, CH Experiment 1: This was a controlled pen trial conducted over 56 days, involving 12 steers that were fed Rhodes grass hay Experiment 2: In this trial, 45 heifers were selected and grazed together in a single paddock for 60 days to assess the effects of biochar on productivity and CH Results: In the controlled pen trial (Experiment 1), biochar supplementation resulted in a reduction of CH₄ emissions by 8.8-12.9% without any negative effects on rumen fermentation or dry matter intake (DMI). Minor changes were observed in the rumen bacterial community, particularly in the Conclusion: While the results from controlled feeding conditions suggest that biochar has the potential to reduce enteric CH₄ emissions, the lack of significant findings under grazing conditions highlights the need for further research. Future studies should focus on identifying biochar types, doses, and delivery methods that are effective in reducing CH₄ emissions in grazing systems without compromising cattle productivity.

Indexed as

biochargreenhouse gaslivestockmicrobial communitiesrumen

Identifiers

PMID39629207
PMCPMC11611548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.