ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Effect of fit-for-purpose biochars on rumen fermentation, microbial communities, and methane production in cattle.
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research landscape and transfer-oriented synthesis of diet-based enteric methane mitigation in ruminants (2005-2025): A bibliometric and implementation-focused review.Veterinary world · 2026Article
- Greenhouse gas sequestration in poultry farming: Strategies for sustainable production and environmental impact mitigation.Poultry science · 2026Review
- Effects of walnut shell biochar feed additive on rumen fermentation, nutrient utilization, and performance in fattening lambs.Veterinary and animal science · 2025Article
- Biochar in Animal Agriculture: Enhancing Health, Efficiency and Environmental Sustainability.Veterinary medicine and science · 2025Review
- Date palm seed-derived biochar as an environmentally sustainable feed supplement in cattle: impacts on gas production, methane emissions, fermentation parameters and performance predictions.BMC veterinary research · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Biochar has gained significant attention as a possible anti-methanogenic supplement for ruminants due to its potential to reduce methane (CH₄) emissions from enteric fermentation. However, its effects on rumen methanogenesis have been inconsistent and, in some cases, contradictory. These variations are likely influenced by factors such as the type of biochar used, its source material, and how it is administered, including the form in which it is provided and the dosage needed to achieve desired outcomes. This study aimed to examine the effects of two fit-for-purpose biochars on rumen fermentation, CH Experiment 1: This was a controlled pen trial conducted over 56 days, involving 12 steers that were fed Rhodes grass hay Experiment 2: In this trial, 45 heifers were selected and grazed together in a single paddock for 60 days to assess the effects of biochar on productivity and CH Results: In the controlled pen trial (Experiment 1), biochar supplementation resulted in a reduction of CH₄ emissions by 8.8-12.9% without any negative effects on rumen fermentation or dry matter intake (DMI). Minor changes were observed in the rumen bacterial community, particularly in the Conclusion: While the results from controlled feeding conditions suggest that biochar has the potential to reduce enteric CH₄ emissions, the lack of significant findings under grazing conditions highlights the need for further research. Future studies should focus on identifying biochar types, doses, and delivery methods that are effective in reducing CH₄ emissions in grazing systems without compromising cattle productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.