ArticleJournal of pediatrics. Clinical practice2024
A Comparison of the 2022 Versus 2011 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Web-Based Risk Estimator for Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia.
Article in Journal of pediatrics. Clinical practice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Clinical and Imaging Data-based Machine Learning for Early Diagnosis of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia: A Meta-analysis.Current medical imaging · 2025Pooled it
- Validation of the NICHD Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia Outcome Estimator 2022 in a Quaternary Canadian NICU-A Single-Center Observational Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To compare the predictive accuracy of the 2022 vs 2011 National Institute of Child Health and Human Development estimator for identifying infants at high risk for bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Methods: We conducted a single-center retrospective study of infants ≤28 weeks' gestation. Demographic and respiratory support data were used to calculate risk for BPD or death by the BPD estimators. Our outcomes of interest included (1) treatment with systemic steroids for BPD and (2) composite outcome of death or highest severity of BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age. We used c-statistics and area under receiver operator characteristic curves (AUC) to compare accuracy of the BPD estimators. Results: A total of 159 infants (mean gestational age, 26 weeks; mean birth weight, 837 g) were included. Steroid treatment for BPD occurred in 61 infants. We found that predictive accuracy was similar for both 2022 and 2011 BPD estimators, with c-statistics ranging from 0.77 to 0.89, indicating good-to-excellent accuracy for predicting steroid treatment. Twenty-one infants had death or grade 3 BPD based on definitions used in the 2022 estimator, and 68 infants had death or severe BPD based on definitions used in the 2011 estimator. Overall, we found both BPD estimators had poor AUC for predicting infants at high risk for death or highest severity of BPD, with the exception of the 2022 estimator, which had an acceptable AUC of 0.773 on postnatal day of life 28. Conclusions: The 2022 and 2011 BPD estimators both demonstrate similar good-to-excellent accuracy for identifying infants at high risk for steroid treatment, but poor-to-fair accuracy for predicting death or highest severity of BPD at 36 weeks' postmenstrual age.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.